Page 11 of 22

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:03 pm
by axl13
How good does Pickett look Wow he is something special, He is exactly what Colligwood needs he has got X Factor written all over him. We need his pace and foot skills

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:04 pm
by Stinger
Laverde for mine.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:08 pm
by September Zeros
Stinger wrote:Laverde for mine.
Like the look of him too. Moves smoothly in traffic and seems a natural footballer, with (dare i say it) a touch of pendles about him.

Has good height too and some nice pace over the first few yards and once he bulks up i think he's a perfect type for the much admired notion of a a big bodied midfielder, who can run, win his own ball but take a nice mark as well.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:15 pm
by Stinger
^^ Agreed.

I liked Pickett too but not for pick 5. If he is there at pick 30, then yes please...but he won't be, so it's not worth worrying about.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:04 pm
by MJ23
5 = Wright if not there Laverde ( I think someone outside the top 6 may push in and give us a hard choice. Could in fact be Laverde )

From those I think could be there at 30. (doubt Picket or Cockatoo will)
30 = R. Mckenzie ( could we be that lucky) Duggan, Vickers-Willis or Lamb - all have great strengths but worrying weakness.

48 = Langdon. Think he could be around. Some early TAC games I listened to he was in everything and he could be there at 48.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:32 pm
by RudeBoy
Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:52 pm
by watt price tully
In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:52 pm
by woftam
RudeBoy wrote:Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.
I've seen Wright play live a couple of times in 2014. Don't think he is anywhere near ready for seniors in 2015 to be honest. I reckon Moore is better as well.
Seen Laverde a few times as well. Reminds me of a Malceski more than a Pendles or Bonts.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 6:06 pm
by Museman
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
One of them will be there...... if not Petracca will.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:05 pm
by duggieboy
Thanks for putting those up

I like Laverde and Pickett from those.

Laverde looks to have real grunt and toughness - pretty fearless by the looks.

While Pickett has a ton of pace & skill.

If we got either of 'em it'd be a good day at the draft. As to which one suits our needs the best, others will know more than me - I do like toughness at the top level though.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:10 pm
by AN_Inkling
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:20 pm
by watt price tully
AN_Inkling wrote:
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.
That's true to a point. His brother is in Melbourne playing at St Kilda - young Maverick which may well mitigate the go home factor. Then again it could be Cain & Able, Peter & Tim, Liam & Noel...

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:22 pm
by MJ23
I think Leverde has a bit of X factor and what I like most is his leap and attack in the air.
Haven't had a mid do that since Wellers.

That's why scharenberg when fit will be a gun.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:58 pm
by Stupied
AN_Inkling wrote:
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.
Apparently his family is planning on moving back to Melbourne in the likely scenario that he is drafted by a vic club, given his brother already plays for the saints.
No go home factor there folks.

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:30 am
by RudeBoy
woftam wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.
I've seen Wright play live a couple of times in 2014. Don't think he is anywhere near ready for seniors in 2015 to be honest. I reckon Moore is better as well.
Seen Laverde a few times as well. Reminds me of a Malceski more than a Pendles or Bonts.
I'll bow to your opinion woftam, as I haven't seen any of them play, but based my opinion solely on their highlights reels. Based solely on that I reckon Laverde would suit our needs better.