Since when did our colours change to Rainbow?

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Locked
User avatar
bally12
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:00 pm

Post by bally12 »

Thought I'd paste the image we are actually talking about. It's on the Collingwood desktop site, not on the mobile one.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
bally12
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:00 pm

Post by bally12 »

Yehhh...nahhh...don't like it if their intention is to keep it there indefinitely. Each to their own though.

In saying that I think we're done with the thread. Would be good if the club put out an explanation of what it represents exactly, their reasoning as to why it's there, how long it will stay for.
User avatar
masoncox
Posts: 2924
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:32 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by masoncox »

Well it does not look like the rainbow colours.
So what the hell is it and what does it mean?
Don't think it looks like anything associated with gays.
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

^David provided links above.

It's beyond me why any mature adult of sane disposition would find it offensive that the club wants to signal it welcomes diversity. Obviously, a message of inclusivity is needed because many people and minorities are often excluded. If reality were otherwise, the message wouldn't be necessary. And not only is it a necessary message, it's an extremely positive message.

I suggest those with a problem go and ask the President, the CEO, the coach, the captain, the leadership group and the players what they think. Go on: go and make that complaint to Fly or Darcy or Pendles or Bruzzy or Crispy or Sidey and see what they say.

Of course, the coach and players know that proactive inclusivity is needed, and perhaps even more so in sport than other domains, because they live in the real world, not in an imaginary internet world on a laptop in mum and dad's basement.

Some of the arguments put forward in this thread are ridiculously close to those coming out of fascist Russia, whose Supreme Court has just banned overt, public LGBT support. This is probably not the company you want to be keeping:
Russia's Supreme Court has declared what it calls "the international LGBT public movement" an extremist organisation and banned its activities across the country.

...

Last year, those restrictions were extended to all age groups in Russia. References to LGBT people have been deleted from books, films, adverts and TV shows. Earlier this month, one Russian TV channel discoloured a rainbow in a South Korean pop video, to avoid being accused of violating the "gay propaganda" law.

...

At the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, Vitaly Milonov, a famously homophobic MP from the ruling party, United Russia, said the ban on LGBT groups was "not about sexual minorities or the private life of individuals".

"It's more about the political agenda proclaimed by this LGBT international movement," he told me.

...

"And I'm looking forward to the next step: banning the six-colour rainbow flag. We don't need this flag. It's a symbol of the fight with the traditional family. I hope that no-one can show this flag in Russia."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-67565509
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

Yep, top post there pietillidie, a disturbing amount of pro Russian hysteria on here...always good to be reminded that Collingwood is the broadest of broad churches.
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"

Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
User avatar
Bucks5
Posts: 4167
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 19 times
Contact:

Post by Bucks5 »

masoncox wrote:Well it does not look like the rainbow colours.
So what the hell is it and what does it mean?
Don't think it looks like anything associated with gays.
They are the colours used in the progress pride flag which represents the gay, trans and people of colour communities.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/06/pro ... ride-flag/

Image
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say?
Meredith1965
Posts: 529
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:38 pm

Post by Meredith1965 »

Bucks5 wrote:
masoncox wrote:Well it does not look like the rainbow colours.
So what the hell is it and what does it mean?
Don't think it looks like anything associated with gays.
They are the colours used in the progress pride flag which represents the gay, trans and people of colour communities.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/06/pro ... ride-flag/

Image

Yep, the “progress pride flag” which is definitely not, according to some, the flag of “progressive” ideology rolled out wherever its tedious conformist activists can find a pole.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34832
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Nor is it, of course, the flag of "regressive" neo-fascism, so it's not all bad.
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

And whats all this slagging off about Franco I'm hearing these days?
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"

Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29411
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 223 times
Been liked: 311 times

Post by Jezza »

Meredith1965 wrote:It is clearly a progressive Left banner. Anyone who thinks it is not, doesn’t want to see how it is used and by whom.
Spot on.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34832
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:And whats all this slagging off about Franco I'm hearing these days?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQC8LLuW83I
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

Jezza wrote:
Meredith1965 wrote:It is clearly a progressive Left banner. Anyone who thinks it is not, doesn’t want to see how it is used and by whom.
Spot on.
That's in your heads, though. You and the annoying culture war progressives who inhabit your nightmares can go fight it out on Twitter. None of that is the club's problem. The club's responsibility is to be inclusive of all of players and fans, and to make everyone feel welcome, as the president, CEO, coach, captain and senior leaders of the team have clearly and consistently expressed.

If you're unhappy with their performance, and think you know better, as I say, take it up with them, even if no one has seen fit to appoint you to decide who the club should make feel welcome, or to decide who its publics, stakeholders and constituents should be, or what its message to those people should be. Do you even have any management or comms experience?

In fact, we all know you wouldn't have the guts to confront Jeff Browne, Christine Holgate, Cement Truck, Fly, Darcy, Pendles or Crispy and tell them that they're not really being inclusive, but are rather peddling some lunatic progressive war and should stop right now.

They would rightly laugh you out of the room because you're being ridiculous, tarring them with nonsense concocted by lowlifes like Putin and Trump, who would have their cults believe that being inclusive is somehow just the same as being a rioting, looting society wrecker who glues himself to things in protest as he seeks to instigate general anarchy.

Just how many mature leaders of serious, mainstream organisations this side of rural small-town Evangelical America would hold your views on the use of inclusive colours? Do you think any modern sports coach takes affront at the communication of inclusivIty? Go and level your accusations at Fly and school him in your culture wars and see how he reacts. Tell him how the team would be improved if only he stopped being so inclusive and mindful of difference. Go and school him :roll:
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9532
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

Everyone's had a chance to say their piece and the mods team are wary of where this could go from here.

<click>
Locked