Maynard incident > Maynard rule > Brayshaw retirement

[Gerry Cooper]

Should be nothing but like barryhall, a week we can fight

If its a week I think they should take it and move on.

bullshit, no way, carlton got their captain off for worse. just so he could win the brownlow.

he did nothing wrong,

you have to fight that all the $$%^%%$ way

He didn't I agree but Im a pragmatist. One match gets him to play in a grand final. That's what matters.

[Larabee]

I’m late to the discussion here but since when can greenhorn executive Laura Kane overrule the MRC head? What does it have to do with her? She wouldn’t know a weekly rap sheet from a scone recipe, or does she have experience in this? Or is there underlying politics and influence involved in which case a massive can of worms with ongoing legal action could be the end result.

[the fuzz]

AFL wraps up its evidence
Woods says Maynard does not simply flinch, as he said earlier, but it was a conscious decision to turn his body to impact.


He then says even if it isn't a bump, it's a careless offence.


The AFL is now done and it's over to Maynard's defence.



- Michael Whiting

[Skids]

[Damien]

Live updates on the Herald Sun website

[scoobydoo]

Live updates on the Herald Sun website

Another trustworthy media outlet

[David]

Further updates from Zita's Twitter feed:

The AFL has concluded its submissions. It is now over to Collingwood.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
18m
Ihle (Collingwood): At the point where Maynard realises collision is inevitable, he's dealing with somewhere between 0.1 and 0.2 seconds.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
16m
Ihle (Collingwood): The bump provision only applies in circumstances where there's been a decision to bump. It was not put to him that he intended to bump and had the time to form that intention. These are significant omissions.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
12m
Ihle (Collingwood): When you look at how far forward the jump was ... it's no more than one or two metres. It's one stride length.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
9m
Ihle (Collingwood): Although we're not critical of anyone moving or deviating from a path, that seems to be a factor that has contributed significantly to there being a collision.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
6m
Ihle (Collingwood): Maynard was entitled to come forward off his player, he was entitled to jump when he saw Brayshaw about to kick.
David Zita

@DavidZita1
·
2m
Ihle (Collingwood): He's jumped off two legs. That's allowed him to jump higher and it slowed his forward momentum without completely removing it.

[David]

They are emphasizing the "reckless" angle by the look of it. He'll end up with a week I reckon.

Should be nothing but like barryhall, a week we can fight

If its a week I think they should take it and move on.

I don't see how that's even possible, unfortunately. Unless he's found not guilty, any sanctionable offence seemingly gets him a minimum of three.

[lihei]

Live updates on the Herald Sun website

Another trustworthy media outlet

[Piesnchess]

'Maynard says he felt the ball hitting his hand during his spoil attempt.' So he partially effected a smother which was the aim of the action.

You see the ball deviate in the vision. Regardless of the result tonight it will drag on, I suspect the AFL will appeal if he is cleared.

Indeed, we can see the ball go back...and to the left. Back...and to the left

Yes ! and now ,the prosecution in sheer desperation , will now allege that it was indeed MAYNARD who was seen lurking behind that picket fence, with rifle in hand, on the grassy knoll, in Dallas, the day JFK drove by, they say they have positive identification from a certain journalist, Caroline Wlson.

[robevpau1]

"Ihle (Collingwood): He's jumped off two legs. That's allowed him to jump higher and it slowed his forward momentum without completely removing it."

So his primary movement is Upward, not forward ...

[jonmac1954]

You see the ball deviate in the vision. Regardless of the result tonight it will drag on, I suspect the AFL will appeal if he is cleared.

Indeed, we can see the ball go back...and to the left. Back...and to the left

Yes ! and now ,the prosecution in sheer desperation , will now allege that it was indeed MAYNARD who was seen lurking behind that picket fence, with rifle in hand, on the grassy knoll, in Dallas, the day JFK drove by, they say they have positive identification from a certain journalist, Caroline Wlson.

[think positive]

9m
Ihle (Collingwood): Although we're not critical of anyone moving or deviating from a path, that seems to be a factor that has contributed significantly to there being a collision.
David Zita

refering to Brayshaw yeah? he moved into Maynards path, not away from it

[David]

"Ihle (Collingwood): He's jumped off two legs. That's allowed him to jump higher and it slowed his forward momentum without completely removing it."

So his primary movement is Upward, not forward ...

That seems a fair point to consider: how much forward movement was there from Maynard compared with Brayshaw? Who's actually moving faster during the collision?

[David]

Ihle (Pies) says Maynard's hands go to the right, but his centre of mass does not move to the right. He says at this point a collision is "not inevitable" and "not even likely". It is Brayshaw's movement inward that changes this, he says.

Ihle (Pies) says there are .56 seconds between the moment of jumping and the moment of collision.