He’s pissed off he had Brayshaw in a multi.Piesnchess wrote:Goofy gawk Goodwin dropped Bruzza right in the shit, post match, with his vile comments. In all my yrs of footy, I have never, ever, ever, ever, seen a Coach drop an Oppostion player in like that. Coaches have always said. " Look obviously its not up to me, its up to the MRP or Tribunal, lets see how that plays out, but I cant really comment. ". Goodwin, YOU are a total sore loser prick, of the very first magnitude. Karma bus on its way, pal.
Maynard incident > Maynard rule > Brayshaw retirement
Moderator: bbmods
- Gerry Cooper
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:49 am
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 46 times
Not anymore.Magpie Russ wrote:Laura is a Collingwood supporterNo doubt Laura will be working behind the scenes to maximize the penalty.
A question occurs to me - I wonder if she is related to the infamous Kane boys?
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.�
- mudlark
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
- Location: Maroochydore Qld
- Contact:
The incident on the twitter feed appears to be zoomed in and you only see the top half of a Brayshaw but when you watch the footage on the actual game replay you see a definitive stagger. This will go all the way to a court of law if common sense doesn’t come into it.afisher wrote:It’s about ( on the count down clock ) 18:30. in the 1st quarter , but Bradshaw looked quite lucid when he stood up ( watched on slow mo) , so I don’t think there is much in that incident . However a specialist may view it as a cumulative aspect to the cognition at the time of the Maynard knock and contributory to his final concussion. I’m sure the club will have already got the defence and appeal well under wayDavid wrote:Does anyone have footage of that earlier incident?
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
So why was that a free kick to Brayshaw and not a forceful contact below the knees free kick to Adams?LaurieHolden wrote:Via Twitter :David wrote:Does anyone have footage of that earlier incident?
https://twitter.com/maseman8/status/170 ... 93174?s=20
- princem007
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:50 pm
Everyone has focused on Maynard but watch Bradshaw after he kicks , he steps into the path of Maynard , I think he was trying to take out Maynard. Watch the vision and watch Brayshaw veer towards Maynard , he definitely moves into the path of Maynard after kicking it , I never picked it up until today when I watched Brayshaw and not Maynard .
Go Pies...Premiers 2010
- The Starcevich Coterie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:55 pm
- Location: Shoreham
princem007 has hit the nail precisely on the head.
I can't remember hearing any of the media talking heads making this very obvious point...
The behind the goals view clearly shows Maynard jumping to spoil; moving toward Brayshaw's right hand shoulder.
Maynard maintains his line but, as he kicks the ball, it is Brayshaw who veers 20-30cms across Maynard's natural direction of movement, thereby absolutely contributing to the severity of the impact.
Just as Maynard is said to have made a 'split second' decision to try to spoil, Brayshaw makes the 'split second' decision to re-direct his momentum toward Maynard during his kicking motion; changing the incident from a shoulder to shoulder contact to a front on collision.
In fact it is lucky that Maynard was not seriously injured as it was his opponent who decided to exponentially increase the injury potential of the collision.
Despite the severity of the injury etc, Brayshaw contributed to his own demise and so Maynard should be cleared.
I can't remember hearing any of the media talking heads making this very obvious point...
The behind the goals view clearly shows Maynard jumping to spoil; moving toward Brayshaw's right hand shoulder.
Maynard maintains his line but, as he kicks the ball, it is Brayshaw who veers 20-30cms across Maynard's natural direction of movement, thereby absolutely contributing to the severity of the impact.
Just as Maynard is said to have made a 'split second' decision to try to spoil, Brayshaw makes the 'split second' decision to re-direct his momentum toward Maynard during his kicking motion; changing the incident from a shoulder to shoulder contact to a front on collision.
In fact it is lucky that Maynard was not seriously injured as it was his opponent who decided to exponentially increase the injury potential of the collision.
Despite the severity of the injury etc, Brayshaw contributed to his own demise and so Maynard should be cleared.
- think positive
- Posts: 40222
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 319 times
- Been liked: 100 times
- Pebbles Rocks
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Collingwood
- bally12
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:00 pm
"Get me the good stuff" Goody.Mr Miyagi wrote:He’s pissed off he had Brayshaw in a multi.Piesnchess wrote:Goofy gawk Goodwin dropped Bruzza right in the shit, post match, with his vile comments. In all my yrs of footy, I have never, ever, ever, ever, seen a Coach drop an Oppostion player in like that. Coaches have always said. " Look obviously its not up to me, its up to the MRP or Tribunal, lets see how that plays out, but I cant really comment. ". Goodwin, YOU are a total sore loser prick, of the very first magnitude. Karma bus on its way, pal.
He was right in the thick of the Essendon drug saga.
Absolutely no class. The incident was completely an accident.
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisbane
- Been liked: 32 times
anyone got a timestamp on when they showed this on the telecast?LaurieHolden wrote:Via Twitter :David wrote:Does anyone have footage of that earlier incident?
https://twitter.com/maseman8/status/170 ... 93174?s=20
i can pull it from Kayo and post a better version
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 4:43 pm
- Been liked: 1 time
A woman I work with knows Laura Kane well. She is a Melbourne supporter. Her daughter and Laura went to Melbourne games together. Maybe a journo should ask if that clouded her judgement. I don’t believe it did but that’s how journalism works these days.
Painful frustrating disappointing exhilarating and unbelievably awesome. - That's a Collingwood life through and through
-
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:38 pm
She just represents the arse-covering proceduralism and posturing that all cowardly careerists kowtow to today.bucking awesome wrote:A woman I work with knows Laura Kane well. She is a Melbourne supporter. Her daughter and Laura went to Melbourne games together. Maybe a journo should ask if that clouded her judgement. I don’t believe it did but that’s how journalism works these days.
Maynard has to be cleared, in court if not at the tribunal. If it gets to court, the clear deviation into Maynard’s path by Brayshaw after he kicked it should be enough to get it thrown out.
That’s odd because I keep hearing she barracked for Collingwood. No wonder the MRO is confusedbucking awesome wrote:A woman I work with knows Laura Kane well. She is a Melbourne supporter. Her daughter and Laura went to Melbourne games together. Maybe a journo should ask if that clouded her judgement. I don’t believe it did but that’s how journalism works these days.