Would anyone argue if a manager intervened on the decision of an employee?warburton lad wrote:If the Pies win the flag without Brayden Maynard, no one will forget Laura Kane AFL who directly intervened to send this to the Tribunal.
If the Pies don't win the flag without Brayden Maynard no one will ever forget Laura Kane's direct intervention on this matter.
Why have an MRO if the AFL can override/intervene anyways... Christian must be considering handing the keys to his office back...
Maynard incident > Maynard rule > Brayshaw retirement
Moderator: bbmods
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
- shawthing
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 93 times
Let me guess. Laura Kane who knows nothing about playing real football must be a lawyer.Mr Miyagi wrote:
Unprecedented intervention by Laura Kane. Well well well
I tell you this game will be a non-contact sport within two years because everyone is afraid of litigation. Lawyers are the cancer of society. I hate them!
- shawthing
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 93 times
The AFL is just so determined to stop us winning a flag. We battle against the odds every single time. You watch them try to get a flag for Carlton now.
Last edited by shawthing on Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
To the Collingwood legal team:
One argument is that Maynard is left handed. If he was intent on hitting Brayshaw, he would have instinctively turned to lead with his left (DOMINANT) shoulder.
He in fact turned the opposite way, which is what you would do to be defensive, not offensive, i.e. to protect your dominant side.
Maynard turned to the right to protect himself and limit the impact.
One argument is that Maynard is left handed. If he was intent on hitting Brayshaw, he would have instinctively turned to lead with his left (DOMINANT) shoulder.
He in fact turned the opposite way, which is what you would do to be defensive, not offensive, i.e. to protect your dominant side.
Maynard turned to the right to protect himself and limit the impact.
Last edited by What'sinaname on Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisbane
- Been liked: 32 times
- warburton lad
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:47 am
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 58 times
Not necessarily- but if I were the employee of some standing and I were overruled- I would consider walking. More than that, I have done this over the journey.What'sinaname wrote:Would anyone argue if a manager intervened on the decision of an employee?warburton lad wrote:If the Pies win the flag without Brayden Maynard, no one will forget Laura Kane AFL who directly intervened to send this to the Tribunal.
If the Pies don't win the flag without Brayden Maynard no one will ever forget Laura Kane's direct intervention on this matter.
Why have an MRO if the AFL can override/intervene anyways... Christian must be considering handing the keys to his office back...
Her intervention will be overruled by the Tribunal- Maynard walks, or the Pies go to the Appeals board then the Supreme Court.
He plays in the Prelim
Firm in the belief that number 17 flag is only months away...
- shawthing
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 93 times
It's amateur hour. BTW did everyone see Gillon McLaughlin absolutely pissed at the AA Awards? Typical of this bush league. They destroy everything they get their hands on from the VFA to the VFL. Now they will destroy Australian Football itself. **** the lot of them. I spit on their graves.woodys_world69 wrote:
wtf is going on in this league?
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26202
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 94 times
shawthing wrote:Let me guess. Laura Kane who knows nothing about playing real football must be a lawyer.Mr Miyagi wrote:
Unprecedented intervention by Laura Kane. Well well well
I tell you this game will be a non-contact sport within two years because everyone is afraid of litigation. Lawyers are the cancer of society. I hate them!
Well, she sure as heck de nutted ol Chrisso, really got him by the short n curlies, and he shat his daks, so it seems. She has never played a game in her life, but meh, that makes NO diffence these days, hey.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
- magpieazza
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:27 am
- Location: Griffith N.S.W
What the hell, there is no way it should go any further. What a waste of tax payers money and Maynard should sue for slander of character.
If he gets suspended I dont know what Ill do but it wont be nice!!
Surely common sense will prevail and these lawyers should stop turning this into a circus...Fu@$ this red tape, it only lines Lauras pockets!!
If he gets suspended I dont know what Ill do but it wont be nice!!
Surely common sense will prevail and these lawyers should stop turning this into a circus...Fu@$ this red tape, it only lines Lauras pockets!!
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
- stoliboy
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Ok where can we take this decision?!
NACC: The National Anti-Corruption Commission
https://www.nacc.gov.au/
IBAC: The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission
https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/
Court of Arbitration for Sport
https://www.tas-cas.org/
High Court of Australia
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/
Privy Council of the United Kingdom
https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/
Get Mason Cox on the phone to the White House!!!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/
NACC: The National Anti-Corruption Commission
https://www.nacc.gov.au/
IBAC: The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission
https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/
Court of Arbitration for Sport
https://www.tas-cas.org/
High Court of Australia
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/
Privy Council of the United Kingdom
https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/
Get Mason Cox on the phone to the White House!!!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
Can we stop playing the victim? MC graded it as careless. From there it was always going to the tribunal. Laura Kanes grading is irrelevant.
Long way to go now. Reckon we’re ok. Precedence to go on. Clearly a football act. Our damn president is a lawyer. We’ll be ok and Bruzz will be playing.
Long way to go now. Reckon we’re ok. Precedence to go on. Clearly a football act. Our damn president is a lawyer. We’ll be ok and Bruzz will be playing.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
When will you wake up, Laura Kane intervened because MC didn’t think it was a reportable offence.Haff wrote:Can we stop playing the victim? MC graded it as careless. From there it was always going to the tribunal. Laura Kanes grading is irrelevant.
Long way to go now. Reckon we’re ok. Precedence to go on. Clearly a football act. Our damn president is a lawyer. We’ll be ok and Bruzz will be playing.
Go back through the MRO findings and find any other offence which Laura Kane is listed as the person who has laid the charge, go on, I’ll wait…
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
No, it was graded but anything that graded as severe impact and high contact is automatically sent to the tribunal with a minimum 3 week suspension attached, but there is no set penalty to accept.woodys_world69 wrote:wait so it was sent to the tribunal ungraded wasnt it?
the articles are stating they graded it AND sent it to tribunal
if they were able to grade it then let it fall within the criteria...
wtf is going on in this league?
Where did it say that is what happened? I can’t find any mention of her swaying or over ruling. All I can see is that she graded it the same way as MC.eddiesmith wrote:When will you wake up, Laura Kane intervened because MC didn’t think it was a reportable offence.Haff wrote:Can we stop playing the victim? MC graded it as careless. From there it was always going to the tribunal. Laura Kanes grading is irrelevant.
Long way to go now. Reckon we’re ok. Precedence to go on. Clearly a football act. Our damn president is a lawyer. We’ll be ok and Bruzz will be playing.
Go back through the MRO findings and find any other offence which Laura Kane is listed as the person who has laid the charge, go on, I’ll wait…
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisbane
- Been liked: 32 times