Maynard incident > Maynard rule > Brayshaw retirement
Moderator: bbmods
- robevpau1
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:37 am
Definitely not commenting on whether this impacted the Maynard incident, but Brayshaw’s head collided with Adams 4.30 prior to the BM event. It will be interesting to see if this is a relevant discussion point raised by lawyers in the tribunal case this week.- Tom Browne
https://twitter.com/i/status/1700082329488851104
Maybe already concussed prior to the BM event?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1700082329488851104
Maybe already concussed prior to the BM event?
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26202
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 94 times
What'sinaname wrote:Exactly. Bruz chose to turn his body. He chose the more difficult action.Piesnchess wrote:What'sinaname wrote:All Bruz had to do was put his arms out in front of him to protect himself. As soon as he turned, he was fkd
Ever tried to turn your body at full pace, flying thru the air, full pelt , in a split second, to smother the ball, nah, thought not.
Jeezus thank Christ you would never be on my Jury, shit, I meant he was flying thru the air, contact was unavoidable, he could not turn his body to avoid collision , smart arse.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
I am sure if Pickett did this to Naicos, you'd all be arguing that it was a football action. Right? Thought not!Piesnchess wrote:
Ever tried to turn your body at full pace, flying thru the air, full pelt , in a split second, to smother the ball, nah, thought not.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
Taken a breath. I don’t think what’s her face has is a problem, it’s just part of their process and bad reporting. Not taking any of this Gill stepped in bs into account.
Exactly as anyone who knows the grading process thought. Pies would know this was what was happening and would have already been working on a rock solid defence.
If he doesn’t get off, might as well put bibs on and play netball.
Exactly as anyone who knows the grading process thought. Pies would know this was what was happening and would have already been working on a rock solid defence.
If he doesn’t get off, might as well put bibs on and play netball.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
Well that’s interesting! Be funny if Bruz gets off and Melbourne get fined for not following concussion protocols. UPDATE: tweet deleted!!!robevpau1 wrote:Definitely not commenting on whether this impacted the Maynard incident, but Brayshaw’s head collided with Adams 4.30 prior to the BM event. It will be interesting to see if this is a relevant discussion point raised by lawyers in the tribunal case this week.- Tom Browne
https://twitter.com/i/status/1700082329488851104
Maybe already concussed prior to the BM event?
Last edited by Mr Miyagi on Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 87 times
If Maynard isn't cleared to play I'd back the club taking it to court because it's clear he's being held to a different set of rules to that of Cripps, Duncan and McCartin.
Two of those cases occurred this season, while Cripps was cleared and free to win the Brownlow just 12 months back.
Those aren't rulings from a different era.
Personally I don't think the AFL has a leg to stand on if credibility and fairness still matters.
Two of those cases occurred this season, while Cripps was cleared and free to win the Brownlow just 12 months back.
Those aren't rulings from a different era.
Personally I don't think the AFL has a leg to stand on if credibility and fairness still matters.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
Cripps was suspended for 2 weeks. His legal team got him off on a technicality which has subsequently been closed by the AFL. So using Cripps as an example doesn't work.swoop42 wrote:If Maynard isn't cleared to play I'd back the club taking it to court because it's clear he's being held to a different set of rules to that of Cripps, Duncan and McCartin.
Two of those cases occurred this season, while Cripps was cleared and free to win the Brownlow just 12 months back.
Those aren't rulings from a different era.
Personally I don't think the AFL has a leg to stand on if credibility and fairness still matters.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.