WE CANNOT, must NOT, lose our next Grand Final!

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
David
Posts: 50591
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 53 times

Post by David »

"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26200
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Harrysz wrote:Um, just for the record re 2018 Grand Final, it's ridiculous to say that we lost because of one bad umpiring decision (Rosebury). West Coast won the second quarter, the third quarter and the last quarter. In the last quarter in particular they dominated us. Apart from the first 5 minutes when we kicked 2 goals and a couple of rare forays forward, West Coast had the ball incessantly in attack. They missed several easy chances and then got a goal from the boundary line. The chances were that if not for Sheed's goal they would've got another goal.
The scores were level at three quarter time. The game was up for grabs. West Coast won the last quarter as our boys ran out of puff.

As in 1970 and 1979 we gave up a big lead and lost. And even in 1981 we held a 21 points lead in the third quarter but we still lost. In those 4 Grand Finals we were not fit enough or not good enough or both. Blaming umpires is ridiculous.

As for me, I would never miss a Grand Final in which Collingwood played. Yes seeing us lose is heartbreaking but I was there in 1990 and 2010 and I savoured every moment.


OK, I take your point, but fact is, we still had a lead, a very minor lead, granted, but we led, till Rosebury got us, that was defintely a free to Maynard, The game then takes an entirely different turn, its like sliding doors moment, its all very well to say, the Weagles may have goaled anyway, but there is NO way you can tell that. Maynard kicks it, along boundry, ball in dispute, ball ups, whose to say how it would have gone, with us clinging to a very small lead. ? The ump reamed us, and thats it, Leigh Matthews said it was a howler of a decision, at that point. Bottom line is , we will never know, is done, and was a very very bitter pill to swallow, it upset me as much as 1970, that day of infamy. :? :o
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20065
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Jack Darling doesn't drop a mark late in the game, WCE win by more than a goal. So yeah, as Harrysz said, WCE won the game more than the umpires won the game.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26200
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by Piesnchess »

What'sinaname wrote:Jack Darling doesn't drop a mark late in the game, WCE win by more than a goal. So yeah, as Harrysz said, WCE won the game more than the umpires won the game.


yeh but still doesnt alter the fact, the game takes a whole new turn, had Maynard been paid that free, game goes in different direction, who can say what may have happened. ?? Heck, Len Thompson missed a sitter goal, from goal square, in 1966 GF, shocker miss, we lost by a point, he kicks that, we are Premiers, the swings and roundabouts of outrageous fortune, which has never, ever, favoured us, in GFs. :o
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20065
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Piesnchess wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Jack Darling doesn't drop a mark late in the game, WCE win by more than a goal. So yeah, as Harrysz said, WCE won the game more than the umpires won the game.


yeh but still doesnt alter the fact, the game takes a whole new turn, had Maynard been paid that free, game goes in different direction, who can say what may have happened. ?? Heck, Len Thompson missed a sitter goal, from goal square, in 1966 GF, shocker miss, we lost by a point, he kicks that, we are Premiers, the swings and roundabouts of outrageous fortune, which has never, ever, favoured us, in GFs. :o
I mean, using that logic, then you can then blame Langdon for not rushing a behind in the first quarter. He rushes the behind, we get the kick out from a point and the whole game goes in a different direction.

So, Langdon cost us the Premiership.
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2244
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

I blame the frigging footy gods or whoever that gives out the potions of luck or the rub of the green
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2244
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

I blame the frigging footy gods or whoever that gives out the potions of luck or the rub of the green
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26200
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by Piesnchess »

dp
Last edited by Piesnchess on Thu Feb 23, 2023 8:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26200
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by Piesnchess »

What'sinaname wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Jack Darling doesn't drop a mark late in the game, WCE win by more than a goal. So yeah, as Harrysz said, WCE won the game more than the umpires won the game.


yeh but still doesnt alter the fact, the game takes a whole new turn, had Maynard been paid that free, game goes in different direction, who can say what may have happened. ?? Heck, Len Thompson missed a sitter goal, from goal square, in 1966 GF, shocker miss, we lost by a point, he kicks that, we are Premiers, the swings and roundabouts of outrageous fortune, which has never, ever, favoured us, in GFs. :o
I mean, using that logic, then you can then blame Langdon for not rushing a behind in the first quarter. He rushes the behind, we get the kick out from a point and the whole game goes in a different direction.

So, Langdon cost us the Premiership.


NO, a million things can happen from Langdon, the Maynard cockup was very late in the match, and could have gone either way, Lazza sums it up above , the **** Gods just loathe us, thats a fact. :o
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34832
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

I do not understand why people want to re-live the 2018 Grand Final. After 1/4 time, Collingwood was mostly terrible. The loss was inevitable - 25 goals would have been a fairer reflection of how poor the team actually was. We were only in the game late because we were playing against a poor team that, any other season, might have finished about 15th.

Seriously, losing the midfield contest to that collection of lazy bludgers? A choke of the most disgusting order. It was the worst effort I have ever seen from Collingwood in a Grand Final - and that's saying something because I've seen plenty. The whining about the umpiring is depressing - a half-way decent team would never have been in that position after the lead they created, early.
lazzadesilva
Posts: 2244
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by lazzadesilva »

Piesnchess wrote: NO, a million things can happen from Langdon, the Maynard cockup was very late in the match, and could have gone either way, Lazza sums it up above , the **** Gods just loathe us, thats a fact. :o
Yes Piesnchess, very hard to argue against a bastard pattern of nothing but sheer bad luck in that 2018 GF. Of course you also have to include our general bad play, poor decision making at times, occasional atrocious umpiring decisions etc but in the same breath luck definitely plays a part. Just ask the tiprat about the 2010 bounce in front of the goals
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️
perthmagpie
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 10:11 am
Location: Yarrawonga

Post by perthmagpie »

In 2018 we went into our defensive shells. We became afraid of switching the play. We started kicking the ball down the line and giving up possession by being beaten in the air. It was our own fault.
Magpies love pies(Lol)
Harrysz
Posts: 1524
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melbourne
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Harrysz »

Back in about 1978 we played Hawthorn at Vic Park. With seconds remaining we were a couple of points down. The ball was bouncing towards our goal and our captain Ray Shaw was about to pick it up and put it through. But then a Hawthorn player shoved Shaw in the middle of the back. No free kick was paid, the siren went and we lost.

Our coach Tommy Hafey was on World of Sport the next morning. The first question asked was what he thought of the non-free kick to Shaw which clearly cost us the game. I'll never forget his answer which was " We should never have been in a position where a bad umpiring decision could cost us the game!"

Umpiring decisions, like the weather, are things which are beyond our team's control. Teams which are good enough overcome these adversities. And maybe just maybe there were crucial free kicks not paid to West Coast back in 2018. As supporters of the other side we don't see them. The reality is that they gave us a 5 goals lead and ran us down. The reason for that is a whole lot more complicated than one umpiring decision.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26200
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 92 times

Post by Piesnchess »

lazzadesilva wrote:
Piesnchess wrote: NO, a million things can happen from Langdon, the Maynard cockup was very late in the match, and could have gone either way, Lazza sums it up above , the **** Gods just loathe us, thats a fact. :o
Yes Piesnchess, very hard to argue against a bastard pattern of nothing but sheer bad luck in that 2018 GF. Of course you also have to include our general bad play, poor decision making at times, occasional atrocious umpiring decisions etc but in the same breath luck definitely plays a part. Just ask the tiprat about the 2010 bounce in front of the goals
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
buzzlightyear
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:41 am

Post by buzzlightyear »

In my naivety after the 1990 GF win, I thought the tide of history would turn and the strike rate of GF's wins to appearances would improve. :roll:

1 W 4 L & 1 D since :cry:

We just need to play more GF's to win one than any other team. Here's hoping we are in the GF this year and we can sit back and get ready for more drama, angst and maybe with a bit of luck, Sweet 16!
Buzz
Looking for sweet 16.....
Post Reply