#41 Brody Mihocek
Moderator: bbmods
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26200
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 228 times
- Been liked: 93 times
-
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm
Fantastic! Was there for perhaps his first game in black and white at Manuka in a preseason game against the Giants, must of been 2018, he stood out for his endeavor and play reading.
Now, about children; does he have a partner, and are they sporty?
Now, about children; does he have a partner, and are they sporty?
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"
Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8000
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 26 times
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20065
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
I hear 90nice presented him with his jumper for his first game.Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Fantastic! Was there for perhaps his first game in black and white at Manuka in a preseason game against the Giants, must of been 2018, he stood out for his endeavor and play reading.
Now, about children; does he have a partner, and are they sporty?
Drop Mihocek
Sorry but whether you're unfit or out of form it equals the same outcome which is "ineffective". Hasn't produced for 8 weeks.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:21 pm
Checkers has taken some huge hits for the team in the second half of the season and it's obviously taken its toll. He may have to do a Presti in 2010 and admit that he can't give 100% for the team. I like Krueger as a tall forward against Freos not so tall backline. And i'm getting the sense that Fly and Leppa are leaning that way.
Just a quick side issue, can Fly be questioned for not planting big Cox in the goalsquare in the last ten minutes.
Just a quick side issue, can Fly be questioned for not planting big Cox in the goalsquare in the last ten minutes.
Personally, I’m not sure it’s as much about dropping Miochek but more about finding a way to bring Krueger into the 22.
I would rather offer some additional on field support to Miocheks role, than drop him. I keep going back to Cox only playing 45% game time and very little of that in the forward line ( Cox did not pick up one possession inside our own forward 50 ) That says to me the coach no longer sees him as a forward option. If there’s a chance of rain, Cox automatically struggles even more because of the restrictions wearing glasses.
I also don’t buy into the Krueger isn’t fit enough thinking. He’s fit enough alright, otherwise he wouldn’t be picked as the sub when there’s always the possibility of coming on five mins into the game. What Krueger is lacking is touch but he’s mobile and quickish and the game will likely be played at ground level this week. I reckon there’s more chance of Cox being omitted than Miochek and if the Cox replacement is Krueger, that can only be of benefit to Miochek. Krueger can also relieve in the ruck for 5 mins every quarter, albeit badly. We also dont rely on winning centre clearances to win games of footy, so while it’s always preferable to get first use, we clearly have the defence to win it back and then then launch the other way.
I would rather offer some additional on field support to Miocheks role, than drop him. I keep going back to Cox only playing 45% game time and very little of that in the forward line ( Cox did not pick up one possession inside our own forward 50 ) That says to me the coach no longer sees him as a forward option. If there’s a chance of rain, Cox automatically struggles even more because of the restrictions wearing glasses.
I also don’t buy into the Krueger isn’t fit enough thinking. He’s fit enough alright, otherwise he wouldn’t be picked as the sub when there’s always the possibility of coming on five mins into the game. What Krueger is lacking is touch but he’s mobile and quickish and the game will likely be played at ground level this week. I reckon there’s more chance of Cox being omitted than Miochek and if the Cox replacement is Krueger, that can only be of benefit to Miochek. Krueger can also relieve in the ruck for 5 mins every quarter, albeit badly. We also dont rely on winning centre clearances to win games of footy, so while it’s always preferable to get first use, we clearly have the defence to win it back and then then launch the other way.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
- simon tonna
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:40 am
- Location: carindale
I don’t want to bag the bloke but I’ve been leaning towards him to be dropped for quite some time now but because of experience and not he’s goal kicking or decision making. I called for Krueger to be he’s replacement for the match against geebung just for him to be rested and if we won the match he would have been forced a 4 week rest/rehab recovery.
Krueger was also vulnerable with basically zero match fitness so it’s understandable to see why he was a medi-sub only but this week may be different.
Checkers according to some regular track watchers are saying has a hip complaint.
Krueger was also vulnerable with basically zero match fitness so it’s understandable to see why he was a medi-sub only but this week may be different.
Checkers according to some regular track watchers are saying has a hip complaint.
no second chances
- 3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Contact:
Totally agree Checkers was giving us nothing Coxy would have been a harder match up for their Backs.rambler wrote:Checkers has taken some huge hits for the team in the second half of the season and it's obviously taken its toll. He may have to do a Presti in 2010 and admit that he can't give 100% for the team. I like Krueger as a tall forward against Freos not so tall backline. And i'm getting the sense that Fly and Leppa are leaning that way.
Just a quick side issue, can Fly be questioned for not planting big Cox in the goalsquare in the last ten minutes.
- WhyPhilWhy?
- Posts: 9532
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: Location: Location:
- Has liked: 38 times
- Been liked: 33 times
- think positive
- Posts: 40221
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 319 times
- Been liked: 99 times
he doesnt need dropping, he needs support. have a look at a lot of forwards who barely get touched by opposition players, because there are other forwards taking the defenders too. he works his arse off, just needs a breather in between. and maybe some target practice!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!