geezus, thats damn disgusting, poor child, and the price gouging??? WTFwatt price tully wrote:Aboriginal kid caught stealing his dinner is sent somewhere a lot scarier than empathy training
https://www.betootaadvocate.com/headlin ... -training/
Parliament House sexual assault and harassment allegations
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40222
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 319 times
- Been liked: 100 times
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
It is for a civil action and no, Shorten was not "cleared" by the police.watt price tully wrote:Except Bill Shorten was cleared by the Police. Her case when they were teenagers was examined by the police.stui magpie wrote:Dennis Denuto has quoted for the job.5 from the wing on debut wrote:It's clear that she has no idea about legal fees as she has a goal of only $10k.
If what she says is remotely true it shines a spotlight on the blatant Hypocrisy of Labor and it's supporters.
So the police examined the issue, questioned others and said no case to answer.
With Porter the AFP didn’t question anyone related (the victim was of course and unfortunately dead)
If the case is for a civil action then that is another matter.
That's not the way the system works.
The police have either ceased the investigation after making all inquiries as they have decided there is insufficient evidence to convict or the case is still pending. It really doesn't matter which of them has occurred as either way it seems to be over as it's unlikely after all of this time that there will be any new corroborating evidence. The police and the courts generally do not "clear" people of crimes as it is not something that they are called upon to do.
It's not real - it's supposed to be satire, or some sort of a piss take.think positive wrote:geezus, thats $$%^%%$ disgusting, poor child, and the price gouging??? WTFwatt price tully wrote:Aboriginal kid caught stealing his dinner is sent somewhere a lot scarier than empathy training
https://www.betootaadvocate.com/headlin ... -training/
It starts off by stating that a 10 year old, who was supposedly starving and thin, was hiding a loaf of bread and packaged ham in his footy shorts. Didn't that give you a clue?
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
I’m pretty sure TP knew it was a satire, that’s why she wrote “...and the price gouging WTF...”5 from the wing on debut wrote:It's not real - it's supposed to be satire, or some sort of a piss take.think positive wrote:geezus, thats $$%^%%$ disgusting, poor child, and the price gouging??? WTFwatt price tully wrote:Aboriginal kid caught stealing his dinner is sent somewhere a lot scarier than empathy training
https://www.betootaadvocate.com/headlin ... -training/
It starts off by stating that a 10 year old, who was supposedly starving and thin, was hiding a loaf of bread and packaged ham in his footy shorts. Didn't that give you a clue?
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
The same police force which has the political power to say hotel quarantine is beneath them decided not to pursue charges against the leader of the ALP with evidence and witnesses available.5 from the wing on debut wrote: It is for a civil action and no, Shorten was not "cleared" by the police.
That's not the way the system works.
The police have either ceased the investigation after making all inquiries as they have decided there is insufficient evidence to convict or the case is still pending. It really doesn't matter which of them has occurred as either way it seems to be over as it's unlikely after all of this time that there will be any new corroborating evidence. The police and the courts generally do not "clear" people of crimes as it is not something that they are called upon to do.
Then they decided they would pursue George Pell with far less evidence and witnesses available to them.
Meanwhile this poor woman still wants justice whereas Porter's alleged victim had withdrawn her complaint.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
But it comes down to what power some people have in different places.
In Victoria having the support of Abbott and Howard is not a good thing, but have the support of John Setka and you're probably untouchable!
It's like how the ALP became the supporters of same sex marriage and LNP the evil party holding it back, when the 2 previous ALP governments opposed it because they wanted the support of the Catholic Church.
It's just like how the narrative in the left dominated world of social media is that Porter is guilty and the police force didn't do enough to prosecute him but Shorten was completely cleared and it's a completely different scenario.
In Victoria having the support of Abbott and Howard is not a good thing, but have the support of John Setka and you're probably untouchable!
It's like how the ALP became the supporters of same sex marriage and LNP the evil party holding it back, when the 2 previous ALP governments opposed it because they wanted the support of the Catholic Church.
It's just like how the narrative in the left dominated world of social media is that Porter is guilty and the police force didn't do enough to prosecute him but Shorten was completely cleared and it's a completely different scenario.
- doriswilgus
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
- Location: the great southern land
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
The big difference between the Shorten and Porter cases is that Shorten was subject to a ten month long investigation from the police,who subsequently decided there was not enough evidence to lay charges against him.Wheras in the Porter case,the police didn’t even bother to investigate because the poor woman who was allegedly raped had killed herself and was in no position to press charges.I don’t know why this is so hard for Liberal partisans to accept.Trying to conflate the two issues is clearly a partisan attempt on their part to muddy the waters,and to take the heat off Porter.
You are wrong on the facts of the Porter case.
The police did not investigate because after speaking to the police over many months, the woman did not make a statement to the police. Not only that, but before committing suicide she is reported to have advised the police that she would not be proceeding.
It wasn't that she was in no position to proceed, she could have, but chose not to.
The police did not investigate because after speaking to the police over many months, the woman did not make a statement to the police. Not only that, but before committing suicide she is reported to have advised the police that she would not be proceeding.
It wasn't that she was in no position to proceed, she could have, but chose not to.
- think positive
- Posts: 40222
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 319 times
- Been liked: 100 times
actually i read it again and it still doesnt strike me as satire!!!!id prefer it to be, so i hope it is!!!!watt price tully wrote:I’m pretty sure TP knew it was a satire, that’s why she wrote “...and the price gouging WTF...”5 from the wing on debut wrote:It's not real - it's supposed to be satire, or some sort of a piss take.think positive wrote: geezus, thats $$%^%%$ disgusting, poor child, and the price gouging??? WTF
It starts off by stating that a 10 year old, who was supposedly starving and thin, was hiding a loaf of bread and packaged ham in his footy shorts. Didn't that give you a clue?
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- David
- Posts: 50591
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 54 times
Last edited by David on Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- doriswilgus
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
- Location: the great southern land
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
It was reported from those closest to the woman was that she didn’t proceed with the complaint because of mental health reasons,because it was too stressful for her to continue with the process.At no stage did she ever retract her accusation that she was raped by Porter.So no,I was not wrong about the Porter case.5 from the wing on debut wrote:You are wrong on the facts of the Porter case.
The police did not investigate because after speaking to the police over many months, the woman did not make a statement to the police. Not only that, but before committing suicide she is reported to have advised the police that she would not be proceeding.
It wasn't that she was in no position to proceed, she could have, but chose not to.