#46 Mason Cox

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

When the AFL flip flopped (yet again) on a rule, namely allowing defenders to once again put hands in the back of a forward (from 2019), that is when Cox became irrelevant again. He was allowed to use his giant frame in 2018 because defenders weren’t allowed to hold him off the ball with hands in his back. Now they simply stick their hands in his back and work him under the ball. His value is basically nothing again cos of the rule being removed.

Just like the Steve McKee rule and the capped interchange rule and the sub rule, we have been screwed yet again out of our strengths by the AFL.

It’s borderline cheating. “What does Collingwood do well? Hmm, what rule can we introduce to stop their potential domination?”
Est. 2002
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13408
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 353 times
Been liked: 100 times

Post by piedys »

Raw Hammer wrote:When the AFL flip flopped (yet again) on a rule, namely allowing defenders to once again put hands in the back of a forward (from 2019), that is when Cox became irrelevant again. He was allowed to use his giant frame in 2018 because defenders weren’t allowed to hold him off the ball with hands in his back. Now they simply stick their hands in his back and work him under the ball. His value is basically nothing again cos of the rule being removed.

Just like the Steve McKee rule and the capped interchange rule and the sub rule, we have been screwed yet again out of our strengths by the AFL.

It’s borderline cheating. “What does Collingwood do well? Hmm, what rule can we introduce to stop their potential domination?”
Agreed wholeheartedly on all points; case closed.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20080
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 27 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Cox failed Bucks one too many times.

Can't get a game even when Cameron is dropped.

He doneski!!!!
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

What'sinaname wrote:Cox failed Bucks one too many times.

Can't get a game even when Cameron is dropped.

He doneski!!!!


The Reid bros are made of glass, both could go out in same game,! I wouldnt write off Cox just yet, looks like now Cameron is out of favour, but Reid is no real full forward, if Grundy needs ruck help, and the poor bugger sure does, then Cox is the likely one to help him out, we cannot have Grundy rucking entire games, especially in this four game turn around match games, he will get worn out. :?
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
PyreneesPie
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
Has liked: 66 times

Post by PyreneesPie »

^ Absolutely agree with you Piesnchess. I'm hoping that Coxy will get another chance to show his value at some point across this condensed schedule.
Alex
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:10 pm

Post by Alex »

I hope Cox gets another game too, to show his worth, but Cameron should be first option out of the three.
"That was out-of-bounds"
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 41 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

Hard to know if players are rested or out of favor.

I was impressed by Cameron's performance only because he exceeded my early expectations ... doesn't demand selection, but is young and has done enough to keep his spot. We just need to look at Jonathon Ceglar to see not everyone needs to be AA to play... he will be ok. But if we were screaming out for a KP gun, he was never going to be IT. Not yet anyway.

I like Reid, he is good enough to be the AFL's best FF backup. He is my favorite as CHF with Checkers as 3rd. tall. (Reid will probably kick 6 tomorrow. lol )

Cox is by far our best option. Even on a bad day the bottom feeders get plenty of good opportunities. On his day, he can play deep, luring opposition to him. As a result, he does impact the opposition rebound, and by being a threat deep, he does create more room for us at HF.
Big Dan
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:47 pm
Location: The Outside World

Post by Big Dan »

IMHO - Cox is a far better option than Cameron right now. He looks a more natural forward that can play ruck. Also helps take the tallest defenders away from Mihocek, so even if he's not getting the ball, the decoy is a treat.

Is not our worst by a long shot.
User avatar
Haff
Posts: 5026
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 1:24 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 55 times

Cox staying put in 2021

Post by Haff »

Looks like Mason has triggered the games requirement for him to remain a Magpie next year. Reports are he is on 550k per year.

FWIW for 2020 he is best 22 and our fwd line functions so much better with him in. Swap Cameron for JDG and we will have a potent enough fwd 6.

Next season though he should be shopped around assuming we can get some quality talls in the trade period. I’m concerned 550k is big overs but if he was to stay I think he does give us enough.[/url]
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
K
Posts: 21534
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Cox staying put in 2021

Post by K »

Haff wrote:... I’m concerned 550k is big overs but if he was to stay I think he does give us enough.
Collingwood always overpays.
Last edited by K on Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Cox staying put in 2021

Post by inxs88 »

Haff wrote:Looks like Mason has triggered the games requirement for him to remain a Magpie next year. Reports are he is on 550k per year.

FWIW for 2020 he is best 22 and our fwd line functions so much better with him in. Swap Cameron for JDG and we will have a potent enough fwd 6.

Next season though he should be shopped around assuming we can get some quality talls in the trade period. I’m concerned 550k is big overs but if he was to stay I think he does give us enough.[/url]
He is yet to trigger anything
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
K
Posts: 21534
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 31 times

Post by K »

Fairfax reports he has easily met the trigger clause.
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

K wrote:Fairfax reports he has easily met the trigger clause.
You might mean News Corp. He needs more matches to trigger his clause.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
K
Posts: 21534
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 31 times

Post by K »

No, I mean "Fairfax" (technically not called that now.) But maybe News Corp says the same. I trust the reporting for now. He does not need more matches according to them. The last two were enough.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7697
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 93 times
Been liked: 183 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

He triggers a lot of Collingwood supporters.
Post Reply