Moderator: bbmods
He'd be a big eater I reckon! That could cost you.BucksIsFutureCoach wrote:I'll shout Coxy's avo on toast for the next 12 months if he agrees to stay.Damien wrote:I hope he was telling Coxy that he is absolutely a required player who is in our best 22qldmagpie67 wrote:Bucks tweeted this today
I'll shout the coffees to go with it !!Damien wrote:He'd be a big eater I reckon! That could cost you.BucksIsFutureCoach wrote:I'll shout Coxy's avo on toast for the next 12 months if he agrees to stay.Damien wrote: I hope he was telling Coxy that he is absolutely a required player who is in our best 22
You're in Qld, how bout you just pinch the Avo's and post the to the club.qldmagpie67 wrote:I'll shout the coffees to go with it !!Damien wrote:He'd be a big eater I reckon! That could cost you.BucksIsFutureCoach wrote: I'll shout Coxy's avo on toast for the next 12 months if he agrees to stay.
True, Melbourne didn't put on a lot of pressure. But he won in the ruck, where obviously there's no tackling. And remember, it looks like the bounce is going. Now it becomes a basketball throw up. Any problems he had with judging the bounce disappear and the tall players will have a major advantage.4everpies wrote:All of a sudden Mason Cox has turned into a cross between Peter Moore and Gary Dempsey. He's unique but he still hasn't proved that he will make it in AFL.
I don't want him to leave, but I also don't want us to break the bank to keep him.
For all those who are blaming the club for him wanting to leave, what do you want them to do? Tie him down and hold him hostage? He's out of contract and wants to play first ruck which cannot happen if Grundy is playing.
The combination of Cox and Grundy looked good last weekend, but let's face it, Melb put no pressure on at all.
Not forgetting, of course ,that the Melbourne ruck muppets was on track for AA selection according to most commentators and when a 6'10' person jumps as high as they can with their knee cocked and pointed straight at your chest,/ thigh/head,then THAT is a tackle albeit a slightly different form of one.If we lose Cox after the years we've put in we have not learned a single thing. We lost absolutely nothing when Cox was solo in Grundy's absence and I reckon he'll even get a Brownlow vote. We must keep him at all costs.jatsad wrote:True, Melbourne didn't put on a lot of pressure. But he won in the ruck, where obviously there's no tackling. And remember, it looks like the bounce is going. Now it becomes a basketball throw up. Any problems he had with judging the bounce disappear and the tall players will have a major advantage.4everpies wrote:All of a sudden Mason Cox has turned into a cross between Peter Moore and Gary Dempsey. He's unique but he still hasn't proved that he will make it in AFL.
I don't want him to leave, but I also don't want us to break the bank to keep him.
For all those who are blaming the club for him wanting to leave, what do you want them to do? Tie him down and hold him hostage? He's out of contract and wants to play first ruck which cannot happen if Grundy is playing.
The combination of Cox and Grundy looked good last weekend, but let's face it, Melb put no pressure on at all.
And he's the tallest.
Lucky Nicks doesn't hand out the Brownlow. We'd be giving 1 away a month!mudlark wrote:Not forgetting, of course ,that the Melbourne ruck muppets was on track for AA selection according to most commentators and when a 6'10' person jumps as high as they can with their knee cocked and pointed straight at your chest,/ thigh/head,then THAT is a tackle albeit a slightly different form of one.If we lose Cox after the years we've put in we have not learned a single thing. We lost absolutely nothing when Cox was solo in Grundy's absence and I reckon he'll even get a Brownlow vote. We must keep him at all costs.jatsad wrote:True, Melbourne didn't put on a lot of pressure. But he won in the ruck, where obviously there's no tackling. And remember, it looks like the bounce is going. Now it becomes a basketball throw up. Any problems he had with judging the bounce disappear and the tall players will have a major advantage.4everpies wrote:All of a sudden Mason Cox has turned into a cross between Peter Moore and Gary Dempsey. He's unique but he still hasn't proved that he will make it in AFL.
I don't want him to leave, but I also don't want us to break the bank to keep him.
For all those who are blaming the club for him wanting to leave, what do you want them to do? Tie him down and hold him hostage? He's out of contract and wants to play first ruck which cannot happen if Grundy is playing.
The combination of Cox and Grundy looked good last weekend, but let's face it, Melb put no pressure on at all.
And he's the tallest.
Sorry to be the one to point out the BLEEDING obvious ,but I did say Brrownlow VOTE!!! Perhaps ONE!! for his game against Geelong. Maybe you should just walk anyways.dalyc wrote:Lucky Nicks doesn't hand out the Brownlow. We'd be giving 1 away a month!mudlark wrote:Not forgetting, of course ,that the Melbourne ruck muppets was on track for AA selection according to most commentators and when a 6'10' person jumps as high as they can with their knee cocked and pointed straight at your chest,/ thigh/head,then THAT is a tackle albeit a slightly different form of one.If we lose Cox after the years we've put in we have not learned a single thing. We lost absolutely nothing when Cox was solo in Grundy's absence and I reckon he'll even get a Brownlow vote. We must keep him at all costs.jatsad wrote: True, Melbourne didn't put on a lot of pressure. But he won in the ruck, where obviously there's no tackling. And remember, it looks like the bounce is going. Now it becomes a basketball throw up. Any problems he had with judging the bounce disappear and the tall players will have a major advantage.
And he's the tallest.
If Mason Cox wins a Brownlow, I'll walk backwards to Perth.
Ah yes. I see. apologies.mudlark wrote:Sorry to be the one to point out the BLEEDING obvious ,but I did say Brrownlow VOTE!!! Perhaps ONE!! for his game against Geelong. Maybe you should just walk anyways.dalyc wrote:Lucky Nicks doesn't hand out the Brownlow. We'd be giving 1 away a month!mudlark wrote: Not forgetting, of course ,that the Melbourne ruck muppets was on track for AA selection according to most commentators and when a 6'10' person jumps as high as they can with their knee cocked and pointed straight at your chest,/ thigh/head,then THAT is a tackle albeit a slightly different form of one.If we lose Cox after the years we've put in we have not learned a single thing. We lost absolutely nothing when Cox was solo in Grundy's absence and I reckon he'll even get a Brownlow vote. We must keep him at all costs.
If Mason Cox wins a Brownlow, I'll walk backwards to Perth.
