#38 Jeremy Howe

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Neil Appleby wrote:So we get Howe and pick 68 for Kennedy & Seedsman. Thought we might have done better. Pick 68 won't even be used.
Something seems crook in Tallarook if that's the case.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Top
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:
Contact HAL

Post by HAL »

themonk wrote:
fractal wrote:Brett Anderson ‏@BrettAndersonIF 4m4 minutes ago

Four-way trade details...
Melb: Kennedy, 29 (PA), 50 (PA)
Coll: Howe, 68 (PA)
Port: Toumpas, 32 (Adel)
Adel: Seedsman

So we lose Seedsman and Kennedy for Howe and 68 .., hmm digesting.
That's a joke
What do you have that is it?
Top
scoobydoo
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 pm
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 7 times

Post by scoobydoo »

That doesn't make sense. We got pk 32 for seedsman & got Howe & pk 68 for Kennedy??
Is that right?
Top
User avatar
TurkishPie
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Abbotsford

Post by TurkishPie »

fractal wrote:Brett Anderson ‏@BrettAndersonIF 4m4 minutes ago

Four-way trade details...
Melb: Kennedy, 29 (PA), 50 (PA)
Coll: Howe, 68 (PA)
Port: Toumpas, 32 (Adel)
Adel: Seedsman

So we lose Seedsman and Kennedy for Howe and 68 .., hmm digesting.
This is sh*t
Top
Dr Pie
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Dr Pie »

fractal wrote:Brett Anderson ‏@BrettAndersonIF 4m4 minutes ago

Four-way trade details...
Melb: Kennedy, 29 (PA), 50 (PA)
Coll: Howe, 68 (PA)
Port: Toumpas, 32 (Adel)
Adel: Seedsman

So we lose Seedsman and Kennedy for Howe and 68 .., hmm digesting.
And we are also getting next years 2nd round pick to from St Kilda. Presumably if we get a second round from GWS as part of the Treloar deal, we will end up giving that pick and our own second round pick to the Brions for Aish. Throw in the First round picks to GWS and it would seem our first draft pick is 47. Seems a bit ordinary even in this draft.
Born and raised in Black and White
Top
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

What? Seedsman and Kennedy for Howe (and Pick 68, or nothing). Surely not.
Est. 2002
Top
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44994
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 18 times
Contact:
Contact Dave The Man

Post by Dave The Man »

Pick 68 to put in the Treloar Trade?
I am Da Man
Top
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7855
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Post by burnsy17 »

Cant be right - surely we havent traded Kennedy and Seedsman for Howe.

There needs to be a 2nd round pick in there somewhere for us to cover seedsman?

Then again, straight swap Howe for seedsman and swap
Kennedy for pick 68??

That kind of makes sense?
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Top
User avatar
stoliboy
Posts: 4978
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 57 times

Post by stoliboy »

Image
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
Top
Pies Passion
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:31 am

Post by Pies Passion »

burnsy17 wrote:Then again, straight swap Howe for seedsman and swap
Kennedy for pick 68??

That kind of makes sense?
My thoughts exactly.

Howe for Seedsman is a marginal win for us.
Kennedy for pick 68 is a marginal loss for us.

Not ideal, but it does make sense. In effect we've lost two blokes who are fringe and expendable for a guy who could potentially add a nice element to our forward structure.
Top
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Yeah, Kennedy isn't worth anything tbh, it's Seedsman for Howe and Kennedy for 68 (courtesy trade).
Top
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:
Contact HAL

Post by HAL »

burnsy17 wrote:Cant be right - surely we havent traded Kennedy and Seedsman for Howe.

There needs to be a 2nd round pick in there somewhere for us to cover seedsman?

Then again, straight swap Howe for seedsman and swap
Kennedy for pick 68??

That kind of makes sense?
What if I said it can?
Top
User avatar
stoliboy
Posts: 4978
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 57 times

Post by stoliboy »

Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
Top
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Also, I'd add that neutrals are saying we've made out like bandits and I tend to agree. We've got a best 22 forward for a never made it midget and a fringe player who couldn't cement a spot (and who has a huge gap between the barely see it best and his worst).

I'm happy with this, and we're a lay down misere for Mark of the Year :lol:
Top
User avatar
Neil Appleby
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Neil Appleby »

Well the question I have to ask is, why would we even bother with pick 68? If the draft is as shallow as we have been led to believe, 68 is not worth a zac.
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”