So we've got pick 5 and 30. Who do you want?

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
axl13
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:17 pm

Post by axl13 »

How good does Pickett look Wow he is something special, He is exactly what Colligwood needs he has got X Factor written all over him. We need his pace and foot skills
User avatar
Stinger
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Stinger »

Laverde for mine.
User avatar
September Zeros
Posts: 3086
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:43 pm
Location: Behind you

Post by September Zeros »

Stinger wrote:Laverde for mine.
Like the look of him too. Moves smoothly in traffic and seems a natural footballer, with (dare i say it) a touch of pendles about him.

Has good height too and some nice pace over the first few yards and once he bulks up i think he's a perfect type for the much admired notion of a a big bodied midfielder, who can run, win his own ball but take a nice mark as well.
No Pressure, No Diamonds

They used to be a happy team at hawthorn.
________________
User avatar
Stinger
Posts: 1170
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Stinger »

^^ Agreed.

I liked Pickett too but not for pick 5. If he is there at pick 30, then yes please...but he won't be, so it's not worth worrying about.
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

5 = Wright if not there Laverde ( I think someone outside the top 6 may push in and give us a hard choice. Could in fact be Laverde )

From those I think could be there at 30. (doubt Picket or Cockatoo will)
30 = R. Mckenzie ( could we be that lucky) Duggan, Vickers-Willis or Lamb - all have great strengths but worrying weakness.

48 = Langdon. Think he could be around. Some early TAC games I listened to he was in everything and he could be there at 48.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22143
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 131 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

RudeBoy wrote:Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.
I've seen Wright play live a couple of times in 2014. Don't think he is anywhere near ready for seniors in 2015 to be honest. I reckon Moore is better as well.
Seen Laverde a few times as well. Reminds me of a Malceski more than a Pendles or Bonts.
Museman
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am

Post by Museman »

watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
One of them will be there...... if not Petracca will.
User avatar
duggieboy
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:08 pm
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 3 times

Post by duggieboy »

Thanks for putting those up

I like Laverde and Pickett from those.

Laverde looks to have real grunt and toughness - pretty fearless by the looks.

While Pickett has a ton of pace & skill.

If we got either of 'em it'd be a good day at the draft. As to which one suits our needs the best, others will know more than me - I do like toughness at the top level though.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.
Well done boys!
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

AN_Inkling wrote:
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.
That's true to a point. His brother is in Melbourne playing at St Kilda - young Maverick which may well mitigate the go home factor. Then again it could be Cain & Able, Peter & Tim, Liam & Noel...
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

I think Leverde has a bit of X factor and what I like most is his leap and attack in the air.
Haven't had a mid do that since Wellers.

That's why scharenberg when fit will be a gun.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
User avatar
Stupied
Posts: 2332
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:29 am

Post by Stupied »

AN_Inkling wrote:
watt price tully wrote:In my new opinion (It is Monday after all) change no 5 so far:

If Wright is available take him first. He's too good to pass up

If Wright is unavailable take Laverde.

If neither Wright, Laverde (and McCartin / Brayshaw) are not available then who is the new no 5 that we want?

Possibly Weller.
Anyone but Weller. Not another Southport mid thanks. We just got rid of one of those.
Apparently his family is planning on moving back to Melbourne in the likely scenario that he is drafted by a vic club, given his brother already plays for the saints.
No go home factor there folks.
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22143
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 131 times

Post by RudeBoy »

woftam wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:Wright looks a ready made power forward who could play round 1 next year.

However, given we've already got Cloke, Reid, Moore, Grundy/Witts and possibly Mason Cox as our KPFs, I'm not sure we need another loping giant of a full forward.

Laverde would give us much more flexibility all over the ground (except the ruck) and he oozes class a la Pendles and Botempelli.
I've seen Wright play live a couple of times in 2014. Don't think he is anywhere near ready for seniors in 2015 to be honest. I reckon Moore is better as well.
Seen Laverde a few times as well. Reminds me of a Malceski more than a Pendles or Bonts.
I'll bow to your opinion woftam, as I haven't seen any of them play, but based my opinion solely on their highlights reels. Based solely on that I reckon Laverde would suit our needs better.
Post Reply