The not drafting or trading for James Stewart

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Flashman
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:03 pm

Post by Flashman »

From memory we went with Ramsay on what would have been the Stewart pick.

One's a 6ft back pocket the others a 6ft 6 forward.

Hmmm... I don't know if Hine thought that one through too well.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44991
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Hine did not rate him
I am Da Man
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

Flashman wrote:From memory we went with Ramsay on what would have been the Stewart pick.

One's a 6ft back pocket the others a 6ft 6 forward.

Hmmm... I don't know if Hine thought that one through too well.
that draft we snared grundy, kennedy and broomhead. gws took stewart with pick 27, ramsay was next taken with pick 38.

would stewart really gave been ahead of the first three picked?
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
MOTR
Posts: 2160
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:59 pm

Post by MOTR »

Given Stewart went pick 27. Under what scenario could we have secured Stewart and our SA trio.
Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood
User avatar
MOTR
Posts: 2160
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:59 pm

Post by MOTR »

Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44991
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

So the Dawes and Wellingham Trades cost us Stewart?

Though I am very happy with Grundy and Broomhead :D
I am Da Man
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

I think. Or hope, on what we've seen, that we'd have selected Stewart ahead of Ramsay. That's what would have been needed after all was done. GWS bid with 27, we take Stewart with our next pick at 38.

However, as Hine said, we had a lot of uncertainty about our picks in that draft as we were active at the trade table. Would we have pick 38? We just didn't know. If we'd committed to Stewart would one of our deals have fallen through? Would we have been forced to take Stewart ahead of Broomhead, Grundy or Kennedy? I think there was just too much risk involved.
Well done boys!
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

Dave The Man wrote:
Sniparoo:

So the Dawes and Wellingham Trades cost us Stewart?

Though I am very happy with Grundy and Broomhead :D
I'm with you Dave, Grundy and Broomhead are far better long term prospects, both quality players, and both easily 200+ game players, barring the unforseen.
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44991
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I am Da Man
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
Sniparoo:

So the Dawes and Wellingham Trades cost us Stewart?

Though I am very happy with Grundy and Broomhead :D
I'm with you Dave, Grundy and Broomhead are far better long term prospects, both quality players, and both easily 200+ game players, barring the unforseen.
How can Grundy and Broomhead be "far better long term prospects" than Stewart? On what measure?

All 3 are great prospects but it's just a flight of fancy to suggest 1 is better than the other, let alone far better, this early in their careers.
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Dave The Man wrote:So the Dawes and Wellingham Trades cost us Stewart?
I guess in a way, though, I would say the AFL's stupidity in changing the F/S rule to a bidding system did. Just a very stupid idea, imo.
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

jackcass wrote:
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
Sniparoo:

So the Dawes and Wellingham Trades cost us Stewart?

Though I am very happy with Grundy and Broomhead :D
I'm with you Dave, Grundy and Broomhead are far better long term prospects, both quality players, and both easily 200+ game players, barring the unforseen.
How can Grundy and Broomhead be "far better long term prospects" than Stewart? On what measure?

All 3 are great prospects but it's just a flight of fancy to suggest 1 is better than the other, let alone far better, this early in their careers.
I accepted the Stewart part, referring just to Dawes and Wellingham trades vs Grundy and Broomhead.
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

In that case, I agree. Grundy and Broomhead are far better long term prospects than Wellingham and Dawes.
User avatar
derkd
Posts: 2886
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by derkd »

Everyone needs to take a big deep breath... He has played one good game. Far too early to makes big calls on anyone Stewart or our players. Won't be able to call the winners or loser from this draft for five years. Till then it is all just opinion.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44991
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

derkd wrote:Everyone needs to take a big deep breath... He has played one good game. Far too early to makes big calls on anyone Stewart or our players. Won't be able to call the winners or loser from this draft for five years. Till then it is all just opinion.
Well we got 3 1st Rounders instead of 1 if we had Nominated Stewart
I am Da Man
Post Reply